Sweet and Lowdown


Woody Allen’s most conventional picture in years is being touted as a

real return to form, and I suppose that’s true. His previous effort, Celebrity, was the worst Woody since Mighty Aphrodite (and probably longer than that), so Sweet and Lowdown certainly looks good in comparison. I have to admit, though, that I enjoyed the playful Everyone Says I Love You and the feisty, combative Deconstructing Harry

enough to rate them more highly despite the fact that the auteur was

shamelessly pillaging his own back catalog on both occasions.

Sweet and Lowdown is played at a lower pitch than either of

those films. Sean Penn turns in a showpiece performance as Emmett Ray,

a fictional 1930s jazz guitarist whose story is retold both as a film

narrative and in documentary-style inserts of present-day aficianados

(including Allen himself, Village Voice columnist Nat Hentoff and others), who recount the legends surrounding the brilliant, obscure musician.

Ray is a musician of little renown who claims, with ample

justification, to be the second greatest jazz guitarist in the world,

after Django Reinhardt. Ray has something of a Reinhardt fixation,

having been in the great one’s presence only twice — on both

instances, he fainted. (Allen’s doggedly reverential attitude toward

jazz greats remains welcome and endearing.) Ray himself is

well-respected by his contemporaries, who invite him to impromptu

living-room jam sessions, but his chaotic approach to career and

responsibility blocks his potential to build a successful rep on the

jazz circuit.

Sean Penn’s performance looks like Oscar bait and feels like a

stunt, though he is preternaturally adept at this sort of stunt. What’s

delivered is pure showmanship — impressive and entertaining, but not

affecting. The movie’s emotional center, rather, is Samantha Morton,

who plays the sweet mute girl whom Ray reluctantly accepts as a kind of

soul mate. Part Virginia Cherrill in City Lights and part Emily Watson in Breaking the Waves,

Morton’s guileless screen presence is undeniable and provides the film

with its only persistent imagery. One such shot encapsulates the

movie’s themes with elegance and economy, showing her listening,

enraptured, on one side of the frame as the casually insensitive Ray,

who sent her around the corner to get dressed after sex, plucks out a

tune with effortless brilliance.

(Later on, Uma Thurman shines in a minor role, and I haven’t been this happy to see her since Pulp Fiction, at least.)

Unfortunately, Ray’s character is another way for Allen to

address his enduring theme of the artist who expresses great beauty and

sensitivity in his work, but is a cad in his personal life. This

conceit smelled a little rancid when Allen trotted it out at the end of

Deconstructing Harry, and, to be honest, I grew weary of seeing it recycled on the way to Sweet and Lowdown‘s emotional climax, which mirrors that of Manhattan so clearly that you can see it coming about a reel before it happens.

Manhattan also dealt with an artist — a writer who flees the

wasteland of TV writing — who gets lucky with a good woman (OK, a good

teenager) and then ditches her callously for a quasi-intellectual

motormouth. Don’t get me wrong — I think Manhattan is a terrific movie, along with Annie Hall

one of the very best films of its decade. The miracle is that Allen’s

character can be so selfish and yet still make us root for him. But by

the time the same gimmick rears up in Sweet and Lowdown, it’s devoid of credibility.

The other problem here is that Ray is fundamentally unlikeable — if we

don’t feel just a little bit of sympathy for him, why should we care

about his unhappiness? Despite typically great Woody Allen music and

terrific Woody Allen performances, this Woody Allen is a little hard to

warm up to. B

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *