It was a terrific year for
The films here are also dominated by men. They’re directed
by men (the single documentary is the one woman-directed exception) and they deal with traditionally male concerns — cooking, adventure
travel, police work, drilling for oil, hunting down and killing your
tormentors. You have to go all the way down to number eight to find a movie with a
female character who does more than just play sidekick (unless you count Angie
in Gone Baby Gone, which I don’t), and that doesn’t make me happy. I could have
slipped Day Night Day Night, Margot at the Wedding,
Ratatouille
It may be primarily that I’m a sucker for exactly this kind of
This year, Daniel Day-Lewis drank everybody’s milkshake. I’m normally not such a huge fan of this kind of stylized, scenery-chewing, attention-grabbing performance, but his work here has a fevered intensity and apparent authenticity that helps lend mythic grandeur to P.T. Anderson’s finest film to date (there’s no contest — this is in a completely different league from the excellent Hard Eight and the intermittently charming Punch Drunk Love, and it blows the doors off the highly derivative Boogie Nights and Magnolia). Anderson keeps the overarching metaphor loose enough that, while it clearly references the socialist agenda of its source material (Daniel Plainview is nothing if not a symbol of the moral failures of capitalism) it can also be read in its unavoidable contemporary context — without too much of a stretch, I think — as a blistering take on the roots of U.S. foreign policies. (In her New York Times review, Manohla Dargis calls it “an origin story of sorts,” which sums it up.) It’s not a perfect film, but its flaws hardly matter in comparison to its achievement.
While we’re thinking about long dark nights of the American soul, it pays to take another look at David Fincher’s psychological thriller, which kicked the year off right. It’s almost perverse, in this day and age, for a major filmmaker to make a big
Into the Wild
More than anything else in recent memory, Into the Wild reminded me of Vincent Gallo’s time-capsule road movie, The Brown Bunny. (Yes, that’s a compliment.) Like Gallo, Sean Penn — employing his directorial chops with smart, startling confidence — borrows stylistic tropes from 1970s cinema. Here, they help prop up the out-of-time idealism evinced by his protagonist. As the ill-fated (and, some would argue, ill-prepared) adventurer Christopher McCandless, Emile Hirsch conveys exactly the right combination of gentle smarts and naïveté. Penn portrays McCandless as a kind of folk hero, but won’t let him completely off the hook for abandoning the family that loves him, or for indulging in a cocky self-regard that helped lead to his death. That undercurrent saves the film — with its whitewater-kayaking, moose-hunting, testosterone-friendly scenarios — from playing as pure macho indulgence. Instead, it unfolds as the tragedy of an American boy who’s wise and crazy, heroic and pathetic: an American myth for the 21st century.
The Bourne Ultimatum
How do you feel about waterboarding? Jason Bourne is against
it. Much ink was spilled in the latter half of the year about the commercial
failure of issue-oriented cinema directly addressing the Iraq War (think The
Kingdom, Lions For Lambs, and In the Valley of Elah). But less attention was
paid to the emotional subtext of the third movie in the Bourne trilogy, which
dealt finally with a soldier’s long-sublimated anger at being manipulated and
deceived by his commanding officers. Of course Shooter covered some of the same
territory — even making the anger felt toward
Gone Baby Gone
Yes, I had my doubts. I’m not a big fan of Dennis Lehane’s
novels, and what critic was excited about the prospect of Ben Affleck making
his directorial debut? Turns out it’s the freshman film of the year. The
machinations behind the film’s central mystery turn out to be fairly ludicrous,
but they work brilliantly as emotional provocation. (Clint Eastwood, having
recently reinvented himself as an expert director of melodramas, might also
have had a field day with this material.) Affleck’s obvious affection for the
blue-collar
The Assassination of Jesse James by the Coward Robert Ford
This awkwardly (but aptly) titled film is a triumph of mood worthy of Terrence Malick. Tracing the roots of celebrity culture all the way back to 1883, writer/director Andrew Dominik imagines the last few months of the life of Jesse James as a hazy battle of wits between the sharp, charismatic bandit (Brad Pitt), the gang of thieves he no longer trusts, and the young wannabe Robert Ford (Casey Affleck), who exhibits a neediness that borders on creepy. Affleck has plenty of time — nearly three hours — to precisely detail the ways Ford’s idolatry of James turned to resentment and betrayal, and Pitt invests James with charm and humor to balance his occasional murderousness, effectively imagining a man on the downhill side of his own legend. Cinematographer Roger Deakins shoots some scenes with a vignette that blurs the edges of the frame and gives the images a dreamlike feel suited to images half-remembered, stories blurred by the cloudy-glassed lens of time. The result is a languorous masterpiece — a revisionist western about myth, moral compromise, and the male ego.
28 Weeks Later
I popped this one into the DVD player at year end just to
make sure I hadn’t gone completely crazy when I gave it, essentially, a rave
review. Happily, I found that this is still a terrific dystopian horror film
with just the kind of thumb-in-your-eye socio-political commentary that used to
make George Romero movies so special. (I wasn’t a big fan of Land of the Dead,
and I hold out some hope for Diary, but … ) The pre-title sequence alone is a
zombie classic, with its clever inversion of horror convention to emphasize the
safety in darkness while the eyeball-stabbing bursts of sunshine represent
chaos and terror. But things really start cooking when we visit
Manufactured Landscapes
One of my blind spots is probably documentaries — I would
almost always rather see a fiction film than a nonfiction film, and I sometimes
have a stupidly hard time separating my feelings about the aesthetics of a
documentary film from its qualities as journalism. But this film is fascinating
in every regard. It’s ostensibly a study of the work of Edward Burtynsky, whose
photography documents the effect of industry on natural landscapes, but it’s
also a film that encourages thought about the status of those photographs as
art. Further, it eventually deals with the unresolved tension between
Burtynsky’s photographs, which are largely apolitical, and the context of his
project, which is the increasingly intolerable transformation of the
environment by unchecked industry, particularly in
No Country for Old Men
So who is this Anton Chigurh guy, anyway? I’ve seen arguments that he represents death, or God, or fate. (Does he have to symbolize anything?) OK. To me, he represents the existential position. His conversations with his victims are the equivalent of a philosophical debate between someone who believes in arbitrary, ultimately capricious fate, and some poor sucker who still puts some trust in faith, love, free will and conscience. They’re tapped phone calls from Hell to Heaven, charges reversed. But Chigurh never confronts Llewelyn Moss. It’s unnecessary. There would be no argument, because Llewelyn understands that point of view. Partly it’s something he learned and partly it’s something he was born with, a knowledge that led him just so far and no farther. It’s a fine film, but beyond the casting of Javier Bardem — which is a stroke of genius, for sure, making this a top-10 entry and a must-see — I’m not sure the Coens bring all that much to the table that wasn’t already present in the source material. (I keep hearing how it’s Cormac McCarthy’s worst book — which only makes me think I have to run out, like, right now and read everything the man has ever written.)
Honorable mention (in no particular order): Margot at the Wedding, Day Night Day Night, Michael Clayton, The Lives of Others, Grindhouse, Black Snake Moan, The
Host, Black Book, Sweeney Todd: The Demon Barber of Fleet Street
It's one of my favourite McCarthy books, so stick that in your cake and eat it. The Coens do a decent job of bringing it to the screen, but I wasn't as wowed as so many others, because the narrative quirkiness of the novel doesn't quite translate to the screen as much more than a perverse delight in refusing to deliver to the audience what it demands (a confrontation.) In the novel, this makes perfect sense in large part cuz the sheriff's narration is so damned brilliant, you know that there's really no point (as you suggest in your review above.)
Anyways, good top ten. I can't believe I forgot to include Manufactured Landscapes in my top ten. I might just have to go back and do a little Orwellian revisionism...
I've only read No Country and The Road, and while I thought The Road was easily the better book, I thought it was clear No Country was kind of awesome as well. I'll be working my way backwards from here. (My wife's read most of them, but gave them away to friends as she finished, so I have to buy/borrow them all over again.) I'm on a mystery kick right now — just finished Laurie King's The Beekeeper's Apprentice (terrific!) and am about to start either The Big Sleep and/or The Maltese Falcon, never having actually picked up either novel myself.
I'm not sure what I would have made of No Country's narrative strategy if I hadn't already read the novel. Possibly I would have liked the film more and maybe given the Coens too much credit, I don't know.
Good to know you liked Manufactured Landscapes so much. Was that shown on Canadian TV or something before the theatrical release? I think there was a (prohibitively expensive) DVD available through Amazon.com before the U.S. theatrical release that was sourced from Canada.
The dvd was pricey through Amazon.ca as well, but I flipped it on eBay.
I'm particularly embarrassed that I forgot the film (my bookkeeping of film's scene this year has been atrocious) because the director grew up here in Victoria (in fact, she went to Oak Bay High School, where I teach), and is friends of a good friend of mine. Quite aside from the incestuousness of it all, I thought her film was damned fine, just the sort of thing filmmakers should be doing more often with documentaries (using the medium to question/examine/explore the medium) but so rarely do.